Australia’s Nationalist Future May Depend on a Nationals-One Nation Merger
Political commentator and founder of Australian National Review, Jamie McIntyre, says the best political chance for Australia to break free from globalist influence and return to genuine national sovereignty may be for the Nationals and One Nation to join forces under new leadership.
McIntyre argues that Australians are increasingly disillusioned with the two-party system, with both Labor and the Liberals now seen by many voters as serving globalist interests rather than the national interest.
According to McIntyre, the left-right divide in Australia has become little more than political theatre, while on the major issues that matter most, sovereignty, foreign influence, mass immigration, cost of living, energy, freedom of speech, and national identity, both sides continue to deliver policies that weaken Australia rather than strengthen it.
He says the only credible path forward for a true nationalist movement is for the Nationals and One Nation to unite and create a serious third force in Australian politics.
But McIntyre says that for this to happen, Pauline Hanson should step aside and allow a new generation of leadership to emerge, someone younger, more articulate, more broadly appealing, and capable of taking nationalist politics from protest movement to governing force.
“One Nation has played an important role in shaking up the political establishment,” McIntyre said. “But if Australia is serious about becoming a nationalist-led country again, then the movement needs renewal, stronger structure, and leadership that can take the message to a broader audience.”
He said a merged nationalist alliance should stand for Australian sovereignty first, including opposition to supranational control, foreign lobbying interests, erosion of free speech, and policies that continue to place international agendas above the needs of everyday Australians.
McIntyre also said any future nationalist party must immediately abandon support for Israel, arguing that support for foreign interests at the expense of Australia’s own independence is now politically toxic.
“No political party in Australia should continue blindly supporting Israel,” he said. “That position is becoming politically fatal. People are increasingly questioning the level of lobbying and undue influence in both Australia and America. Voters want leaders focused on Australia, not foreign states.”
He said public sentiment is shifting rapidly, and parties that fail to recognise that shift risk political irrelevance.
“The future is Australia for Australia,” McIntyre said. “Not Australia serving global banks, foreign lobby groups, multinational agendas, and endless overseas entanglements.”
McIntyre believes a restructured nationalist political force could tap into growing dissatisfaction among Australians who feel betrayed by both major parties and increasingly ignored on issues such as immigration pressure, housing affordability, farming, inflation, national assets, and cultural identity.
He argues that Australia must eventually position itself as an independent sovereign nation, free from foreign interference and capable of making decisions based on its own long-term interests, including potentially forging closer ties with emerging power blocs such as BRICS rather than remaining locked into declining globalist structures.
“Australia needs to stop acting like a subsidiary of foreign powers and start acting like an independent nation,” McIntyre said. “A nationalist government would put Australian families, Australian farmers, Australian workers, and Australian freedom first.”
He said if the Nationals and One Nation fail to seize the moment, they may waste the best opportunity in decades to build a genuine nationalist alternative to the entrenched political class.
“The political vacuum is there,” he said. “The public anger is there. The loss of trust is there. What is missing is a unified nationalist movement with the courage to put Australia first, unapologetically.”
Australia for Australians. Sovereignty over submission. National interest over globalist control.
