Was the COVID-19 Test Meant To Detect a Virus?
The following is a lengthy, meandering article with a lot of history that is imperative to understand to better understand what’s going on today. I highly encourage you to read it and let it sink in. This virus mania has been tried numerous times before. There’s also a lot about testing you need to understand and the creator of the PCR speaks out loudly and clearly that PCR was NEVER intended to diagnose people. It was created for manufacturing & research purposes. I want you to really grasp the following excerpt directly from the PCR creator:
“PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. “
If things were done right, “infection” would be a far cry from a positive PCR test.
“You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it,” Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics told me. “You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.”
I asked Dr. Rasnick what advice he has for people who want to be tested for COVID-19.
“Don’t do it, I say, when people ask me,” he replies. “No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable.”
