September 16, 2026

McIntyre Report Political Talk Show

Help us help defend free speech and save democracy from the World Economic Forum planned Totalitarian Great Reset. and help us expose the Covid Fraudsters

The Vladimir Putin Interview

Recent News

The next 3 minutes will transform your life forever.

Get our free News Emails on latest articles, alerts and solutions for both legal templates and ways to help fight back against the Globalists vax Mandates , and health resources to boost your immune system and ways to Protect from deadly EMF 5G radiation and more.

FREE E-BOOKS AND REPORTS ALSO

8 * 5 = ?

Please enter the characters shown in the CAPTCHA to verify that you are human.

Australian National Review - News with a Difference!

Budget reply from Gerard Rennick, People First

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email

Treasurer Jim Chalmers handed down the 2026 budget Tuesday night which seems to be aimed at the top echelon of taxpayers.

But it offered no tax relief for teetering pay as you earn employees and no mention of relief for superannuation weekly payments for employers who are under extreme duress from Labor’s excessive-spending economy and unprecedented high fuel prices.

Housing tax has been overhauled with mum and dad investors probably forced to divest their negatively-geared investments over the next few years which Chalmers thinks will provide another 35,000 homes available for first home buyers.

A man in business attire gestures while speaking in a parliamentary setting with red upholstered seating.
Gerard Rennick says the budget failed to deliver significant income tax cuts

We asked People First spokesman Gerard Rennick who is well qualified to speak about taxation and budgets. He has a Master of Taxation Law from the University of Sydney, is a Master of Applied Finance and a Certified Practising Accountant.

This is what he said:

“The budget failed to deliver significant income tax cuts to offset bracket creep that is devasting family budgets as a result of high inflation. While I can live with removing the CGT discount, the extra tax revenue from that measure should have been used to offset income tax rather than remove negative gearing. Negative gearing is more effective (I’m not a fan of it because you have to spend a $1 to get 47 cents back) when income tax rates are high. If tax rates were lowered, then negative gearing would be become a more much ineffective tax strategy.  

“Immigration is forecast to be 2 million over the next two terms of Parliament which is still too high.  Debt levels are forecast to increase which reflects on Chalmers inability to control government spending.”


Source link

Budget reply from Gerard Rennick, People First

Original Source

Related News

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The ANR to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

8 + 3 = ?

Please enter the characters shown in the CAPTCHA to verify that you are human.

Join our censor free social media platform for Independent thinkers

9 - 1 = ?

Please enter the characters shown in the CAPTCHA to verify that you are human.

URGENT: JUST 3 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED TO LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS

Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

Enter Details for free ANR news

8 - 1 = ?

Please enter the characters shown in the CAPTCHA to verify that you are human.