Zohran Mamdani, the Democrat Socialist frontrunner in New York City’s mayoral race, has built his campaign around promises of rent freezes, free bus service, and a city-run grocery system.
But while his platform is marketed as a local, working-class agenda, new filings reveal that a majority of his campaign money is coming from far beyond the five boroughs.
According to the latest campaign-finance records, Mamdani raised about $1.05 million in just five weeks.
WATCH: Military CRISIS Hits Venezuela, Is Donald Trump Preparing For WAR?
Of that total, more than $532,000—or 53%—came from donors outside New York City.
This means nearly half of the funding fueling his campaign is coming from individuals who will never vote in the mayoral election.
That figure is unprecedented in a city where campaigns are traditionally funded by residents directly affected by local policies.
In fact, an analysis by City Limits found that Mamdani has taken in more out-of-state contributions than his two main rivals combined.
His donor base stretches nationwide, pulling in checks from activists and progressive organizations across the country who see Mamdani as a national figure rather than a local candidate.
For Mamdani’s supporters, the outside contributions prove the strength of his grassroots network.
His campaign points out that the average donation size remains relatively small, suggesting he has tapped into the same progressive donor pipeline that powered Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
They argue this fundraising model frees him from dependence on Wall Street or real estate donors that dominate city politics.
Zohran Mamdani Exploits Islamophobia Narrative to Hide His Antisemitic, Communist Agenda
But critics see it differently. New York’s mayor holds one of the most powerful municipal offices in the country, responsible for decisions that shape housing, policing, transit, and public services for more than eight million residents.
Opponents argue that when over half of Mamdani’s financial support comes from people outside the city, it raises questions about whose interests his policies will prioritize.
The optics matter even more under the city’s campaign-finance system.
New York offers an eight-to-one match for small donations from city residents, multiplying the influence of local contributions.
Mamdani’s reliance on outside donors could limit his access to matching funds while fueling the perception that his base lies outside the city he seeks to govern.
Still, the fundraising surge has given him momentum in a crowded field.
With polls showing him ahead of former Governor Andrew Cuomo and radio host Curtis Sliwa, Mamdani’s strategy appears to be resonating, at least for now.
The central question remains whether outside donations translate into votes inside the five boroughs.
As the primary approaches, Mamdani will need to prove that his financial backing reflects more than national enthusiasm—that it represents the will of New Yorkers themselves.
